A question from
Wyoming Bill:
Argh. It is
"NATO". Not "Nato". I don't like this British trend. What
does +Nora Ransom think?
From Wikipedia:
"While acronyms have historically been written in all-caps, British usage is moving towards capitalizing only the first letter in cases when these are pronounced as words (e.g., Unesco and Nato), reserving all-caps for initialisms (e.g., UK and USA)."
From Wikipedia:
"While acronyms have historically been written in all-caps, British usage is moving towards capitalizing only the first letter in cases when these are pronounced as words (e.g., Unesco and Nato), reserving all-caps for initialisms (e.g., UK and USA)."
My answer:
That's not something
I've seen before. An acronym is an abbreviation, as you probably know, and not
all abbreviations are capitalized. I'd be tempted to point out that an acronym
of a proper name, just as an abbreviation of a proper name, should be in all caps,
so UK, but NATO as well, although mm and wysiwyg. Radar, scuba, and sonar would
be special cases because they have actually become words, which is not likely
to be the case for NATO. Does that make sense?
And a few comments:
An acronym is an
abbreviation that can be pronounced as a word. So UK is an abbreviation while
NATO is an acronym.
Abbreviations and
acronyms, unless they are universally recognized, should be defined.
A large number of
acronyms have entered the English language as words.
Sonar: Sound navigation and ranging
Scuba: Self-contained underwater
breathing apparatus
Radar: Radio detection and ranging
Laser: Lightwave amplification by
stimulated emission of
radiation
Wisiwyg never made it
although I still occasionally hear it from computer programmers (what you see
is what you get).
Nearly everything
about writing should made a certain amount of logical sense. Of course, whose
logic and whose sense is another discussion for another day.
No comments:
Post a Comment